The Gareth Morgan Show

It was only a matter of time before Gareth Morgan entered the political sphere with the Opportunities Party. As a wealthy philanthropist, one time economist/kiwisaver fund manager and author of The Big Kahuna he has the time, resources and intellectual firepower to make a mark on New Zealand politics. It would be a shame if his advocacy for restricting the activities of our feline companions, in the interests of native wildlife, prevented a reasoned debate of what are likely to be key components of the new party’s platform – A Universal Basic Income and a Comprehensive Capital Tax. Given the facile nature of most of the New Zealand media I wont go holding my breath. Red Peak. Who cares.

Probably Morgan has recognised the zeitgeist of the moment, the growing discontentment and appetite for change to neo liberal economic policies of the last 30 years as evidenced by the not so surprising rise of Bernie Sanders, Jeremy Corbyn, Podemos and most recently, the Pirate Party in Iceland. Syriza in Greece promised much but ultimately submitted to the existing global status quo. Bernie Sanders also rolled over at the last hurdle and banked on influencing Hillary Clinton rather than running as an independent candidate.

It is not clear at the moment whether the Opportunities Party will be the Gareth Morgan show or a genuine movement of like minded individuals equally able to influence policy. Morgan is quite a forceful and brusque individual, characteristics which polarise many and may not be amenable to the consensus building required of a broad based political movement. Balanced against this is his undoubted drive. Having a healthy personal bank balance also gives him “fuck off” money, to be able to advocate for unpopular policies that others shy away from.

Besides advocating for the extermination of feral cats and other pests (and putting his money where his mouth is) he has also been outspoken on Maori rights and the Treaty.

He has also raised red flags about private debt, the obvious property bubble and the need to prick it, something Key and Little have openly resiled from.

As a supporter of radical tax reform and a Universal Basic Income I remain unsure about his other economic beliefs and skeptical whether a university educated economist can really advocate for overdue reform of the banking and entire financial system that bought us the GFC. He rightly criticizes Labour and National as tinkerers but without addressing the global financial system and how it impacts on New Zealand he runs the risk of being reduced to a tinkerer himself.

If nothing else having another national platform from which to raise important issues should be good for the political health of New Zealand. If the media doesn’t reduce him to a trite, one issue cat killing caricature, in perpetuity. He has the resources and the chutzpah to shake things up. Bring it on.


  1. With regard to your post about Gareth Morgan’s new political party — we don’t need it!

    We already have the NZ First party, which has, as yet-unannounced official policy, the introduction of a full Sovereign Money banking and monetary system, whereby banks would no longer have the power to create new money when they make loans. Rather, they would be forced to become the financial intermediaries that all schools, polytechnics, universities and just about all macroeconomics textbooks have for many decades been teaching that they are.

    By the way, in your article that referred to “overdue reform of the banking and entire financial system”, which said that the Bank of England had revealed the truth that banks are money creators, not financial intermediaries, this was old news. The 1956 Report of the NZ Royal Commission on Banking, Monetary, and Credit Systems spelled it out in great detail. There’s a copy of the 1956 Report in just about every public library.

    The NZ First party’s official policy is to replace bank-created debt-money — which really is funny-money — with RBNZ-created Sovereign Electronic Money, which the RBNZ would create at a rate just sufficient to keep the rate of CPI inflation within the government-set target range. At the country’s present rate of economic growth of 3.3%, and an inflation target of 2%, the RBNZ would be creating approximately 15 billion dollars of new electronic money each year and gifting it, free of interest and free of debt, to the government for spending according to the government’s democratic mandate. The government could, if it so decided, reduce aggregate annual taxation by this amount.
    Why the NZ Taxpayers’ Union continues to ignore this possibility is beyond my comprehension!

    1. That’s really interesting that NZ First has sovereign money as official policy. I wasn’t aware of that. The facile aspersion that it is “funny money” needs to be dispelled and someone with thicker skin than Russel Norman needs to promote it, for Christchurch or elsewhere. Low income housing projects would be a good start

  2. All money is funny money. It is valuable only if you have an obligation to give it to someone or if it is rare and still in demand. The NZ dollar is already sovereign, only the Treasury/RBNZ can issue it, that’s sovereign by definition. The SEM is absurd, it is completely redundant once you realize there is no constraint on the national deficit. The big issue is not what money we use but how we use it, in particular understanding government deficits are how the economy is fuelled and how household debt is alleviated. And why the hell a UBI? That’s so insanely dehumanizing and misanthropist. We need a Kiwi Job Guarantee program.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: